6 worked Property Developers case studies — the position a client typically comes to us with, what we do, and what it is worth. Each is an illustrative example built on the rules that apply to property developers work, not a specific client's file.
Case Study 1 · Backlog brought current
Collections Halted And $34,000 Cut From A 6-Year Backlog — Land Development Company, Brampton
Client: A land development company · Where: Brampton, Ontario · Engagement: 4 weeks, fixed fee
Balance reduced by$34,000
Backlog cleared6 years
CollectionsHalted
The situation — A land development company, Brampton, Ontario
By the time a land development company in Brampton, Ontario called, 6 years were outstanding. The CRA had assessed on estimates. Underneath it sat seasonal revenue reported without matching the costs that produced it.
What we did for A land development company, Brampton, Ontario
We reconstructed the records year by year. We documented the positions to the standard the CRA applies to this sector specifically. Each filing replaced an arbitrary assessment with a real one.
The result — A land development company, Brampton, Ontario
The account is current. Filing on real numbers rather than CRA estimates reduced the balance by $34,000, and a relief application addressed part of the accumulated interest.
Case Study 2 · Records and systems rebuilt
Month-End Close Cut From 11 Weeks To 5 Days — Condo Corporation Manager, Ottawa
The situation — A condo corporation manager, Ottawa, Ontario
The accounting file at a condo corporation manager in Ottawa, Ontario had a weak foundation. It was built on equipment and asset classes assigned by guesswork rather than the CCA schedule. The year-end had taken 11 weeks each of the last three years.
What we did for A condo corporation manager, Ottawa, Ontario
We reviewed every sector-specific deduction against the current rules and claimed the ones that had been missed. We also moved the reconciliations into the monthly cycle, so the year-end stopped being a rebuild.
The result — A condo corporation manager, Ottawa, Ontario
The file reconciles. Month-end closes in 5 days instead of 11 weeks, and the year-end is a review rather than a reconstruction.
Client: A house-flipping operation · Where: Kelowna, British Columbia · Engagement: 7 weeks, fixed fee
Proposed tax cleared$136,000
Review duration7 weeks
OutcomeNo change
The situation — A house-flipping operation, Kelowna, British Columbia
A house-flipping operation in Kelowna, British Columbia was selected for review. Sector deductions claimed on a general-business basis rather than the property developers rules had shown up in the CRA's automated matching. The proposed adjustment on property developers accounting and tax came to $136,000.
What we did for A house-flipping operation, Kelowna, British Columbia
We rebuilt the chart of accounts around how a property developers business actually earns and spends. Every figure in the response traced to a source record the auditor could verify without asking a second question.
The result — A house-flipping operation, Kelowna, British Columbia
The review closed with no change. $136,000 of proposed tax came off the table, and the documentation now in place makes the next review a short one.
Case Study 4 · Structure rebuilt
Reorganisation Completed Tax-Deferred, $20,500 Saved Each Year — Property Management Company, Regina
Client: A property management company · Where: Regina, Saskatchewan · Engagement: 5 weeks, fixed fee
Annual saving$20,500
Tax on reorganisationDeferred
Elections filedOn time
The situation — A property management company, Regina, Saskatchewan
A property management company in Regina, Saskatchewan had outgrown the structure it started with. Industry-specific reporting obligations nobody had flagged was the immediate problem. The longer-term one was that the structure blocked the next step.
What we did for A property management company, Regina, Saskatchewan
We mapped the current structure and modelled the target. Then we reassigned the asset classes on the CCA schedule and corrected the opening balances. The tax-deferred elections were filed on time and the supporting valuations documented.
The result — A property management company, Regina, Saskatchewan
The reorganisation completed without triggering tax, and the new structure saves approximately $20,500 a year while removing the exposure the old one carried.
Case Study 5 · Cash and remittance control
$68,000 Of Working Capital Freed From The Tax Cycle — Commercial Landlord, Winnipeg
The situation — A commercial landlord, Winnipeg, Manitoba
A commercial landlord in Winnipeg, Manitoba was profitable on paper and short of cash every month. A chart of accounts that told the owner nothing about property developers margin explained most of the gap.
What we did for A commercial landlord, Winnipeg, Manitoba
We aligned the reporting calendar with the sector’s own seasonal cycle rather than a generic year-end. We also built a thirteen-week cash view so tax payments stopped competing with payroll for the same dollars.
The result — A commercial landlord, Winnipeg, Manitoba
$68,000 was released back into working capital. Remittances have been on time every period since, and the forecast shows the tax outflow before it lands.
Case Study 6 · Missed incentive claimed
Incentive Review Recovered $65,000 Across 5 Open Years — Real Estate Investment Partnership, Guelph
Client: A real estate investment partnership · Where: Guelph, Ontario · Engagement: 5 weeks, fixed fee
Recovered$65,000
Open years claimed5
Ongoing trackingIn place
The situation — A real estate investment partnership, Guelph, Ontario
An incentive review at a real estate investment partnership in Guelph, Ontario started from a simple question: what has never been claimed? The answer ran to 5 years. It was driven by provincial credits left unclaimed alongside every federal filing.
What we did for A real estate investment partnership, Guelph, Ontario
We documented the positions to the standard the CRA applies to this sector specifically. We documented eligibility to the standard a reviewer would apply rather than the standard a claim form requires.
The result — A real estate investment partnership, Guelph, Ontario
The credits produced $65,000 across the open years. The tracking now in place means the following year's claim is documented as the work happens rather than reconstructed afterwards.
Reviewed by Udit Gupta, Founder and Tax Accountant for the 2025 tax year. These case studies are illustrative worked examples composed from the CRA rules that apply to this type of work, not specific client files; figures are representative and outcomes depend on your own facts.
